For Homeless Housing, Style and Substance Don’t Have to be Mutually Exclusive

For Homeless Housing, Style and Substance Don’t Have to be Mutually Exclusive

by Evan Jacob, April 29, 2014


In a recent post on Architizer, architecture writer Matt Shaw takes issue with the design for a homeless housing building in LA–a city struggling to house and support its more than 57,000 homeless people. Matt notes that the design, by architect Michael Maltzan, is innovative but with only 100 units is not a sufficient response to the scale of LA’s homeless crisis. Matt asks, “Given the systemic, large-scale epidemic of homelessness, should we be looking at style over substance?”

Why isn’t it appropriate to experiment with form when designing housing for the homeless? Certainly our obligation as architects is to provide livable and comfortable if not pleasant and inspiring housing regardless of who we design for. The answer would seem to be that the notion of applied progressive architecture and functional architecture are not mutually exclusive.

 

No Comments


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

*

Keep In Touch
To keep in touch with Pfau Long Architecture, please leave your name, email address and click on the options in which you’re interested:
Places to Work
Places to Learn
Public Environments
Places to Worship
Event & Exhibition
Single Family Living
Multi Family Living
Non-profit
Industry